![]() Signing gives that impression, however they sign developer’s RBZs with no checks as to the code’s intentions - malicious or not - so it’s somewhat illusory.Ī signed extension cannot be altered without it breaking the signed-hash, but if you get your RBZs from a reputable source like EWH, SketchUcation, Smustard or established developers sites, then the issue of it being signed is somewhat academic. ![]() Trimble had this idea that users wanted the comfort of having ‘certified’ extensions. If you trust the source, then running SketchUp in ‘unrestricted’ loading-policy is unlikely to be dangerous and unsigned and in house code will run without difficulty. Also with a new version many developers are playing catchup - to make their code compatible and/or submit their RBZs to be re-signed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |